Triples
10 Minute Observation
Teacher’s Name: Ryan
Dunn Learning Area: Reading Year
Level/Class: Year 7/8
Term:
2
Date: 16/05/12
Observation
Focus:
|
Reading
(General Observation)
|
Learning
Intention:
|
Decoding
difficult words as we read
|
Success
Criteria:
|
·
|
Best
Practice that may be observed:
|
Actual
Observed Practice:
What the observer notices about the clarity
of the learning as well as teacher/ student and student/student conversations
and deliberate acts of teaching.
|
·
Teachers
construct with students what they are leaning and why. (L.I.)
·
The
teacher constructs criteria for achieving the learning with students (S.C.)
·
The
‘learning; and the ‘doing’ are closely matched but separate in function (L.I.
vs the activity)
·
Teachers
construct with students what the learning might look like (exemplars and
models)
·
Teachers
construct with students how well the learning has been achieved
·
Teachers
initiate classroom/student discussions about learning assessment and progress
·
Teachers
use feedback, prompts and questioning to support student learning
·
Use
a variety of instructional strategies to encourage critical thinking and
problem solving
·
Provide
opportunities for active engagement
|
Using whiteboard
and modelling book.
Good introduction –
look at picture, title, questioning to get details – used prior knowledge.
Asked students what
do good readers do –read on to see what makes sense, re-read, find chunks,
breaking words up.
Told children that
any words they get stuck on we’ll tackle them together – good scaffolding
Lots of DAT’s –
questioning, prompting, directing, and giving lots of feedback and praise.
You were specific
with your praise
Each child read a
reasonable chunk
Reminded to look at
the whole word especially the
endings – sweeping
through the word.
Ryan the students
were actively engaged throughout the lesson. Ellice has definitely moved
ahead of Liam. We will need to check this is not holding her back. Will get
that RTLit application soon as possible. Will complete running records (both
fiction and non-fiction) this week. You were using the DAT well and asked
some good questions but still managed to stick to the WALT – decoding. You
prompted and directed when necessary.
|
Student
voice:
Student one
|
Student two
|
|
What
are you learning?
Are
you getting better at…?
How
do you know?
What
are your next learning steps?
|
To
work out words
Yes
Because
I can read bigger words and sweep words when I need to.
Look
at the endings
|
Follow-Up
Conversation:
The goal of the follow-up conversations is to provide the
teacher with supportive feedback geared towards improvement to raise
achievement. The teacher should come away with a sense of what he/she is doing
well. A small number of thins he/she could work on and support to work towards
these goals.
1.
How do you think your lesson went? Did
you achieve what you wanted to?
2.
Observers share what the saw and any student voice they
gathered. (Helps teachers to see their teaching through new eyes)
3.
Talk to us about your inquiry and how it relates to
what we saw today. Share inquiries if happy to do so.
4.
Can you share the progress these students are making?
5.
Where to next do you think?
6.
Co-construct next steps offering suggestions/asking
questions?
7.
What professional support do you require to take these
next steps.
|
Went
OK still finding your feet with teaching decoding strategies. Lots to learn.
As
above – Laura’s WALT’s and children and very similar to Ellice and Liam.
Having
a specific focus on words – the two students need work on decoding.
Feel
the students need to have a toolkit of strategies to use and to know when to
use a particular strategy.
Ellice
appears to be making more progress than Liam. Liam is enjoying the new books
he has been reading from library.
Comprehension
will improves as decoding does.
For
Liam RTLit application
Continue
to work with group each day – focussed teaching on decoding.
·
RTLit
·
Rita
Palmer when she starts working with us
·
Read
‘Reading Fluency’ Ontario Education Department
|
No comments:
Post a Comment